Cloud and AI assurance service

Strengthen AWS security, recover with confidence, and prove control.

We assess cloud, AI, and recovery controls against business impact and technical reality. The work covers human and machine identity, data protection, agent permissions, detection, recovery objectives, exercises, and evidence your engineering, security, and audit teams can use.

What this work should improve.

Every engagement is tied to visible operational or business improvement—not technology activity alone.

01

Prioritized risk

Connect technical findings to business impact, exploitability, service criticality, and remediation effort.

02

Tested recovery

Replace assumed recoverability with documented, rehearsed, and measured recovery capabilities.

03

Continuous evidence

Automate control visibility and retain decision and test evidence for operational and audit use.

The capabilities behind the outcome.

The exact scope is shaped around your estate, constraints, and team. These are the core capabilities we combine.

01

Cloud and AI security posture

Review human and machine identity, networks, data protection, agent permissions, detection, vulnerabilities, logging, and governance.

02

Resilience engineering

Analyze failure modes, dependencies, availability patterns, capacity, backup, and recovery architecture.

03

Disaster recovery

Define RTO and RPO, implement recovery patterns, document runbooks, and conduct exercises.

04

Compliance alignment

Map technical controls and evidence to applicable frameworks without treating compliance as a security substitute.

A clear fit before you commit.

Organizations preparing for audit, responding to control findings, reviewing critical AWS workloads, defining disaster recovery, or needing evidence that security and recovery capabilities work in practice.

Working capability, evidence, and a clear handover.

  • Security, resilience, and control evidence assessment
  • Risk-ranked remediation roadmap
  • Recovery architecture, objectives, and runbooks
  • Exercise results, evidence package, and improvement actions

A practical path from evidence to improvement.

Each stage ends with a decision, working capability, or measured result. Your team stays involved throughout.

  1. 01

    Scope

    Agree critical services, data, threats, obligations, recovery objectives, and stakeholders.

  2. 02

    Assess

    Gather architecture and configuration evidence, validate controls, and model relevant failures.

  3. 03

    Remediate

    Prioritize and implement changes based on risk, dependencies, effort, and business impact.

  4. 04

    Exercise

    Test detection, response, recovery, communications, and evidence; then close the learning loop.

How our delivery model differs.

A focused point engagement can be the right choice. CloudVests is designed for work that must connect evidence, implementation, and operating responsibility.

AreaCloudVests approachTypical point engagement
AssessmentArchitecture evidence plus business impact and operating contextChecklist and configuration findings
ResilienceFailure modes, recovery objectives, dependencies, and exercisesBackup configuration review
ComplianceMapped controls with implementation and evidence supportTemplate policy documentation
OutcomePrioritized remediation and tested capabilityPoint-in-time report

Review the evidence behind our work.

Explore client outcomes, AWS credentials, and practical guidance before deciding what comes next.

Questions teams ask before starting.

Have a question specific to your environment? We can review it with the right engineering specialist.

Ask CloudVests
Which compliance frameworks can you support?

We can align technical cloud controls and evidence to frameworks relevant to your scope, such as ISO 27001, PCI DSS, GDPR, NCA ECC, and SAMA CSF. Formal certification and legal interpretation remain with qualified auditors and counsel.

What is the difference between backup and disaster recovery?

Backups preserve recoverable data. Disaster recovery also covers the systems, dependencies, access, infrastructure, procedures, people, communication, and tested sequence needed to restore an agreed business service.

Can you test recovery without disrupting production?

Often yes. We design isolated recovery exercises and progressive tests appropriate to the architecture and risk. Some failure modes may require carefully approved production testing to provide meaningful evidence.

Will we receive a remediation roadmap?

Yes. Findings are prioritized by business impact, risk, dependency, effort, and urgency, with recommended owners and a practical sequence for implementation and validation.

Does CloudVests provide formal certification or legal advice?

No. We help assess, implement, test, and document technical controls and evidence. Formal certification, audit opinions, and legal interpretation remain the responsibility of qualified auditors, certification bodies, and legal counsel.

Tell us what needs to change.

Tell us about your priorities for security, resilience & compliance. We’ll bring the right specialists to define a practical next step.

Discuss security, resilience & compliance